Generic placeholder image

Current Women`s Health Reviews

Editor-in-Chief

ISSN (Print): 1573-4048
ISSN (Online): 1875-6581

Case Report

Partial Molar Pregnancy Coexisting with a Normal Diploid Fetus: A Case Report

Author(s): Farzaneh Afshar Delkhah, Leila Pourali*, Sara Mirzaeian, Atiyeh Vatanchi and Masoumeh Gharib

Volume 19, Issue 2, 2023

Published on: 14 June, 2022

Article ID: e040422203074 Pages: 4

DOI: 10.2174/1573404818666220404123141

Price: $65

Abstract

Introduction: A partial molar pregnancy is a variation of a molar pregnancy in which an embryo either develops incompletely or with multiple structural anomalies. The aim of this study was to present a rare case of partial molar pregnancy coexisting with a normal diploid fetus.

Case Presentation: A 32-year-old woman with gravid 3, Para 2 (2 previous cesarean sections) was referred to Ghaem hospital, an academic hospital of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran, in 2020 at 34 weeks of gestation due to labor pain. She had an ultrasound-based diagnosis of partial molar pregnancy with the normal female fetus at 30 weeks for the first time. Due to 2 previous cesarean sections and regular uterine contractions, she underwent a cesarean section at 34 weeks and 2 days. A normal female infant with a normal Apgar score was born. The postpartum period was complicated with preeclampsia. The pathological evaluation confirmed partial molar pregnancy. The neonatal Karyotype was 46 XX and the neonatal period was uneventful. Maternal serum β-hCG reached normal after 5 weeks of cesarean.

Conclusion: Partial molar pregnancy with the coexisting normal fetus is a rare condition; however, it may complicate the pregnancy outcomes, which affect both mother and fetus. So early diagnosis and close follow-up may prevent catastrophic maternal and fetal complications.

Keywords: Partial molar pregnancy, preeclampsia, preterm labor, twin pregnancy, outcome, karyotype, diploidy.

Graphical Abstract
[1]
Cunningham, F.G.; Leveno, K.J.; Bloom, S.L.; Dashe, J.S.; Hoffman, B.L.; Spong, C.Y. Williams Obstetrics, 25th ed; McGraw-Hill Education: New York, 2020, p. 389.
[2]
Berek, J.S. Berek and Novak’s Gynecology, 16th ed; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins: Philadelphia, USA, 2019, pp. 1171-1177.
[3]
Odedra, D.; MacEachern, K.; Elit, L.; Mohamed, S.; McCready, E.; DeFrance, B.; Wang, Y. Twin pregnancy with metastatic complete molar pregnancy and coexisting live fetus. Radiol. Case Rep., 2019, 15(3), 195-200.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radcr.2019.11.017] [PMID: 31890067]
[4]
Chhetry, M.; Pokharel, A.; Chaudhary, A.N. Term delivery of a complete molar pregnancy with a coexistent normal pregnancy. Case Rep. Obstet. Gynecol., 2019, 2019, 5090565.
[5]
Zeng, C.; Chen, Y.; Zhao, L.; Wan, B. Partial hydatidiform mole and coexistent live fetus: A case report and review of the literature. Open Med. (Wars.), 2019, 14(1), 843-846.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/med-2019-0098] [PMID: 31737788]
[6]
Atuk, F.A.; Basuni, J.B.M. Molar pregnancy with normal viable fetus presenting with severe pre-eclampsia: A case report. J. Med. Case Reports, 2018, 12(1), 140.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13256-018-1689-9] [PMID: 29779493]
[7]
Pourali, L.; Ayati, S.; Vahidroodsari, F.; Javanmard, M.; Poursadrollah, F. Incomplete molar pregnancy with live coexisting fetus: A case report. Tehran Univ. Med. J., 2014, 71(12), 821-824.
[8]
Pourali, L.; Vatanchi, A.; Ayati, S.; Hamidi, A. ZareiAbolkheir, A. Molar twin pregnancy with a live coexisting triple X fetus: Case report. TUMS, 2018, 76(1), 74-78.
[9]
Kawasaki, K.; Kondoh, E.; Minamiguchi, S.; Matsuda, F.; Higasa, K.; Fujita, K.; Mogami, H.; Chigusa, Y.; Konishi, I. Live-born diploid fetus complicated with partial molar pregnancy presenting with pre-eclampsia, maternal anemia, and seemingly huge placenta: A rare case of confined placental mosaicism and literature review. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res., 2016, 42(8), 911-917.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jog.13025] [PMID: 27225660]
[10]
Ross, J.A.; Unipan, A.; Clarke, J.; Magee, C.; Johns, J. Ultrasound diagnosis of molar pregnancy. Ultrasound, 2018, 26(3), 153-159.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1742271X17748514] [PMID: 30147739]
[11]
Gupta, K.; Venkatesan, B.; Kumaresan, M.; Chandra, T. Early detection by ultrasound of partial hydatidiform mole with a coexistent live fetus. WMJ, 2015, 114(5), 208-211.
[PMID: 26726342]
[12]
Muminhodzic, L.; Bogdanovic, G. Ultrasonographic signs of partial hydatidiform mole. Med. Arh., 2013, 67(3), 205-208.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/medarh.2013.67.205-208] [PMID: 23848045]
[13]
Wang, Y.; Qian, H.; Wang, J. Medical termination of a partial hydatidiform mole and coexisting fetus during the second trimester: A case report. Oncol. Lett., 2015, 10(6), 3625-3628.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/ol.2015.3743] [PMID: 26788180]
[14]
De Franciscis, P.; Schiattarella, A.; Labriola, D.; Tammaro, C.; Messalli, E.M.; La Mantia, E.; Montella, M.; Torella, M. A partial molar pregnancy associated with a fetus with intrauterine growth restriction delivered at 31 weeks: A case report. J. Med. Case Reports, 2019, 13(1), 204.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13256-019-2150-4] [PMID: 31269962]
[15]
Marinho, M.; Nogueira, R.; Soares, C.; Melo, M.; Godinho, C.; Brito, C. Placental spectrum features between mesenchymal dysplasia and partial hydatidiform mole coexisting with a live fetus. J. Clin. Ultrasound, 2021, 49(8), 841-846.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcu.23055] [PMID: 34416021]
[16]
Camacho-Montaño, A.M.; Niٌño-Alba, R. Partial molar pregnancy with live fetus complicated by intrauterine growth restriction and severe preeclampsia. Case report and review of the literature. Rev. Colomb. Obstet. Ginecol., 2020, 71(3), 286-296.

Rights & Permissions Print Cite
© 2024 Bentham Science Publishers | Privacy Policy