Abstract
Aim: The clinical symptoms and laboratory markers of Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) and Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) can be very similar, so making a differential diagnosis between these two diseases is often difficult. Serological parameters to be used in differential diagnosis can guide the clinician. This study aimed to investigate the usability of 14-3-3η (eta) protein as a biomarker in the differential diagnosis of PsA and RA, and the relationships between eta protein and disease activity scores and joint erosions in PsA and RA.
Methods: 54 PsA patients, 53 RA patients, and 56 healthy individuals were included in this study. The ELISA (Enzyme-Linked ImunoSorbent Assay) kit was used as a quantitative sandwich enzyme immunoassay technique to detect human eta protein levels. Receiver- operating Characteristic (ROC) curves analysis was used to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the eta protein.
Results: Eta protein levels were found to be significantly higher in the RA group than in the PsA [B: -0.341, OR (95% CI): 0.711 (0.556-0.909), p: 0.007] and control [B: -0.225, OR (95% CI): 0.798 (0.641-0.995), p: 0.045] groups. Eta protein median values were significantly higher in patients with joint erosion than in those without [β= 0.151, OR (95% CI): 1.163 (1.003-1.349), p: 0.046].
Conclusion: Eta protein levels are higher in the serum of RA patients than PsA and are associated with joint erosion. Eta protein may be a potential biomarker in the differential diagnosis of RA and PsA. It may represent a possible therapeutic step in the pathophysiological pathways in the development of joint erosion.
Keywords: 14-3-3η protein, rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, joint erosion, disease activity, visual analog scale.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1505557] [PMID: 28273019]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210715] [PMID: 28264816]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0004563217733500] [PMID: 28882063]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2022-0244] [PMID: 35790193]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41572-020-0168-y] [PMID: 32327647]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-216655] [PMID: 31969328]
[PMID: 24701255]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/CCLM.2007.027] [PMID: 17311500]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31491-5] [PMID: 28612748]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-208337] [PMID: 26644232]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BOR.0000000000000274] [PMID: 27022911]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/0929867324666170426095015] [PMID: 28462702]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/ar4547] [PMID: 24751211]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2023.110611] [PMID: 37429510]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1756-185X.13921] [PMID: 32909672]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14397595.2019.1637575] [PMID: 31242798]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09674845.2020.1810400] [PMID: 32813981]
[PMID: 17611984]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1756-185X.14004] [PMID: 33225576]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/art.27584] [PMID: 20872595]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/art.21972] [PMID: 16871531]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.berh.2014.10.004] [PMID: 25488780]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14397595.2020.1812870] [PMID: 32820672]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00296-009-1353-1] [PMID: 20180124]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acr.21649] [PMID: 22473918]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3906/sag-1812-137] [PMID: 31651120]
[PMID: 30814078]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-216374] [PMID: 32079570]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10067-017-3807-2] [PMID: 28875246]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.131446] [PMID: 25128504]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13075-016-0935-z] [PMID: 26832367]
[PMID: 30915732]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.141385] [PMID: 26178283]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13075-015-0799-7] [PMID: 26449724]
[http://dx.doi.org/10.34172/aim.2023.85] [PMID: 38310415]