Login Register Cart 0
Generic placeholder image

Current Medical Imaging

Editor-in-Chief

ISSN (Print): 1573-4056
ISSN (Online): 1875-6603

Back
Journal Home About Journal Editorial Board Journal Insight Current Issue Volumes/Issues
Subscribe
Research Article

Exophytic Renal Urothelial Carcinoma Versus Renal Clear-cell Carcinoma: Clinical Data and Computed Tomography Findings

Author(s): Xin Chen, Yidi Chen, Yiwu Lei, Fuling Huang, Cheng Tang and Liling Long*

Volume 18, Issue 12, 2022

Published on: 21 June, 2022

Article ID: e130522204756 Pages: 10

DOI: 10.2174/1573405618666220513125457

Price: $65

Abstract

Background: Distinguishing exophytic renal urothelial carcinoma (ERUC) from exophytic renal clear-cell carcinoma (ERCCC) with collecting system invasion may be difficult as they involve similar locations and collecting system invasion.

Objective: The study aimed to characterize the clinical data and computed tomography (CT) features that can aid in differentiating ERUC from ERCCC.

Methods: Data from 17 patients with ERUC and 222 patients with ERCCC were retrospectively assessed. CT and clinical features exhibiting significant differences in t-tests/Mann-Whitney U-test and chi-square tests/Fisher’s exact tests were analyzed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Variables with an area under the curve (AUC) <0.7 were excluded. Univariate logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the associations of CT and clinical features with ERUC or ERCCC. Variables with odds ratio (OR) values being close to 1 in univariate logistic regression were excluded from multivariate logistic regression. A predictive model was then constructed based on the predictors (p<0 in multivariate logistic regression). Differential diagnostic performance was assessed with AUC values.

Results: Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified preserving reniform contour (OR: 45.27, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.982–411.39) and infiltrative growth pattern (OR: 21.741, 95% CI: 1.898–249.049) as independent predictors that can be used to distinguish ERUC from ERCCC. AUC values for preserving reniform contour, infiltrative growth pattern, and Model-1 were 0.907 (95% CI: 0.817-0.998), 0.837 (95% CI: 0.729-0.946), and 0.947 (95% CI: 0.874–1), respectively.

Conclusion: The independent predictors and predictive model may play an important role in preoperative differentiation between ERUC and ERCCC.

Keywords: Exophytic, urothelial carcinoma, renal clear-cell carcinoma, collecting system invasion, computed tomography, differential diagnosis, independent predictor, predictive model.

[1]
Capitanio U, Bensalah K, Bex A, et al. Epidemiology of renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol 2019; 75(1): 74-84.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2018.08.036] [PMID: 30243799]
[2]
Shuch B, Hofmann JN, Merino MJ, et al. Pathologic validation of renal cell carcinoma histology in the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results program. Urol Oncol 2014; 32(1): e9-13.
[3]
Truong LD, Shen SS. Immunohistochemical diagnosis of renal neoplasms. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2011; 135(1): 92-109.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.5858/2010-0478-RAR.1] [PMID: 21204715]
[4]
Pickhardt PJ, Lonergan GJ, Davis CJ Jr, Kashitani N, Wagner BJ. From the archives of the AFIP. Infiltrative renal lesions: Radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics 2000; 20(1): 215-43.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiographics.20.1.g00ja08215] [PMID: 10682782]
[5]
Raza SA, Sohaib SA, Sahdev A, et al. Centrally infiltrating renal masses on CT: Differentiating intrarenal transitional cell carcinoma from centrally located renal cell carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012; 198(4): 846-53.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/AJR.11.7376] [PMID: 22451550]
[6]
Bata P, Tarnoki DL, Tarnoki AD, et al. Transitional cell and clear cell renal carcinoma: Differentiation of distinct histological types with multiphase CT. Acta Radiol 2014; 55(9): 1112-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0284185113510493] [PMID: 24243889]
[7]
Rouprêt M, Babjuk M, Burger M, et al. European association of urology guidelines on upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: 2020 Update. Eur Urol 2021; 79(1): 62-79.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2020.05.042] [PMID: 32593530]
[8]
Karlo CA, Di Paolo PL, Hricak H, Tickoo SK, Russo P, Akin O. CT of renal cell carcinoma: Assessment of collecting system invasion. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013; 201(6): W821-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/AJR.13.10785] [PMID: 24261389]
[9]
Verhoest G, Avakian R, Bensalah K, et al. Urinary collecting system invasion is an independent prognostic factor of organ confined renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 2009; 182(3): 854-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2009.05.017] [PMID: 19616244]
[10]
Terrone C, Cracco C, Guercio S, et al. Prognostic value of the involvement of the urinary collecting system in renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol 2004; 46(4): 472-6.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2004.07.006] [PMID: 15363563]
[11]
Takamatsu A, Yoshida K, Obokata M, et al. Urinary collecting system invasion on multiphasic CT in renal cell carcinomas: Prevalence, characteristics, and clinical significance. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2021; 46(5): 2090-6.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00261-020-02859-y] [PMID: 33226457]
[12]
Prando A, Prando P, Prando D. Urothelial cancer of the renal pelvicaliceal system: Unusual imaging manifestations. Radiographics 2010; 30(6): 1553-66.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/rg.306105501] [PMID: 21071375]
[13]
Shinagare AB, Davenport MS, Park H, et al. Lexicon for renal mass terms at CT and MRI: A consensus of the society of abdominal radiology disease-focused panel on renal cell carcinoma. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2021; 46(2): 703-22.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00261-020-02644-x] [PMID: 32809055]
[14]
Damgaci L, Ozer H, Rona G. Diagnostic value of MDCT in determining the perinephric fat tissue and renal sinus invasion in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Niger J Clin Pract 2021; 24(4): 489-95.
[PMID: 33851669]
[15]
Gervais DA, McGovern FJ, Wood BJ, Goldberg SN, McDougal WS, Mueller PR. Radio-frequency ablation of renal cell carcinoma: Early clinical experience. Radiology 2000; 217(3): 665-72.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiology.217.3.r00dc39665] [PMID: 11110926]
[16]
Dyer R, DiSantis DJ, McClennan BL. Simplified imaging approach for evaluation of the solid renal mass in adults. Radiology 2008; 247(2): 331-43.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2472061846] [PMID: 18310461]
[17]
Tsili AC, Argyropoulou MI, Gousia A, et al. Renal cell carcinoma: Value of multiphase MDCT with multiplanar reformations in the detection of pseudocapsule. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012; 199(2): 379-86.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/AJR.11.7747] [PMID: 22826400]
[18]
In Walter TA, Ed. Topics in Biostatistics. Humana 2007; pp. 277-8.
[19]
Hill AB. The environment and disease: Association or causation? Proc R Soc Med 1965; 58(5): 295-300.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/003591576505800503] [PMID: 14283879]
[20]
Livesey G, Taylor R, Livesey HF, et al. Dietary glycemic index and load and therisk of type 2 diabetes: Assessment of causal relations. Nutrients 2019; 11(6): 1436.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu11061436]
[21]
Swets JA. Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science 1988; 240(4857): 1285-93.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.3287615] [PMID: 3287615]
[22]
CRAMER JS. The early origins of the logit model. Stud Hist Philos Sci Part Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci 2004; 35: 613-26.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2004.09.003]
[23]
Zhu Q, Zhu W, Wu J, Chen W. Multidetector CT imaging features of invasive renal parenchyma urothelial carcinoma. Br J Radiol 2016; 89(1063): 20151068.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20151068] [PMID: 27146066]
[24]
Ding X, Ma X, Jia Y, Li H, Wang Y. Intrarenal urothelial cancers confused as infiltrative renal masses: Report of 22 cases and literature review. Oncol Lett 2018; 16(2): 1912-6.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/ol.2018.8867] [PMID: 30008883]
[25]
Schrader AJ, Rustemeier J, Varga Z, et al. Urinary collecting system invasion in renal cell carcinoma: Incidence and long-term prognosis. Int J Urol 2009; 16(9): 718-22.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-2042.2009.02353.x] [PMID: 19659680]
[26]
Uzzo RG, Cherullo E, Myles J, Novick AC. Renal cell carcinoma invading the urinary collecting system: Implications for staging. J Urol 2002; 167(6): 2392-6.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(05)64991-9] [PMID: 11992044]
[27]
Shariat SF, Favaretto RL, Gupta A, et al. Gender differences in radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma. World J Urol 2011; 29(4): 481-6.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-010-0594-7] [PMID: 20886219]
[28]
Lorenzo-Gómez MF, Padilla-Fernández B, Antúnez-Plaza P, Gracía-Criado FJ, Mirón-Canelo JA, Silva Abuín JM. Clinical profile and epidemiological changes of clear cell renal carcinoma during 12 years in our health area. Arch Esp Urol 2012; 65(9): 823-9.
[PMID: 23154606]
[29]
Cowan NC. CT urography for hematuria. Nat Rev Urol 2012; 9(4): 218-26.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2012.32] [PMID: 22410682]
[30]
Ito Y, Kikuchi E, Tanaka N, et al. Preoperative hydronephrosis grade independently predicts worse pathological outcomes in patients undergoing nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma. J Urol 2011; 185(5): 1621-6.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2010.12.035] [PMID: 21419429]
[31]
Takagi T, Kondo T, Tachibana H, et al. Comparison of surgical outcomes between resection and enucleation in robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal tumors according to the surface-intermediate-base margin score: A propensity score-matched study. J Endourol 2017; 31(8): 756-61.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/end.2017.0260] [PMID: 28537438]

Rights & Permissions Print Cite
Article Metrics
33
2
© 2024 Bentham Science Publishers | Privacy Policy