Generic placeholder image

Recent Advances in Computer Science and Communications

Editor-in-Chief

ISSN (Print): 2666-2558
ISSN (Online): 2666-2566

General Research Article

A Computational Model for Driver Risk Evaluation and Crash Prediction Using Contextual Data from On-board Telematics

Author(s): Neetika Jain and Sangeeta Mittal*

Volume 15, Issue 4, 2022

Published on: 30 September, 2020

Article ID: e220322186428 Pages: 16

DOI: 10.2174/2666255813999200930164555

Price: $65

Abstract

Introduction: Vehicle crashes can be hazardous to public safety and may cause infrastructure damage. Risky driving significantly raises the possibility of the occurrence of a vehicle crash. As per statistics by the World Health Organization (WHO), approximately 1.35 million people are involved in road traffic crashes resulting in loss of life or physical disability. WHO attributes events like over-speeding, drunken driving, distracted driving, dilapidated road infrastructure and unsafe practices such as non-use of helmets and seatbelts to road traffic accidents. As these driving events negatively affect driving quality and enhance the risk of a vehicle crash, they are termed as negative driving attributes.

Methods: A multi-level hierarchical fuzzy rules-based computational model has been designed to capture risky driving by a driver as a driving risk index. Data from the onboard telematics device and vehicle controller area network is used for capturing the required information in a naturalistic way during actual driving conditions. Fuzzy rules-based aggregation and inference mechanisms have been designed to alert about the possibility of a crash due to the onset of risky driving.

Results: On-board telematics data of 3213 sub-trips of 19 drivers has been utilized to learn long term risky driving attributes. Furthermore, the current trip assessment of these drivers demonstrates the efficacy of the proposed model in correctly modeling the driving risk index of all of them, including 7 drivers who were involved in a crash after the monitored trip.

Conclusion: In this work, risky driving behavior has been associated not just with rash driving but also other contextual data like driver’s long-term risk aptitude and environmental context such as type of roads, traffic volume and weather conditions. Trip-wise risky driving behavior of six out of seven drivers, who had met with a crash during that trip, was correctly predicted during evaluation. Similarly, for the other 12 drivers, the model accurately predicted safe driving behavior as these drivers did not meet with any vehicle crash. The proposed model can be used as an alert mechanism to indicate potential crash scenarios to the driver. The current study did not study lane changing behavior in detail due to difficulty in capturing road lanes in the Indian context.

Keywords: Fuzzy modeling, intelligent transportation, driver assistance systems, crash prediction, driving risk index, on-board telematics, driving behavior, environment context

Graphical Abstract
[1]
Rashmi.P. Payyanadan, Fabrizzio.A. Sanchez, and John.D. Lee, "Influence of familiarity on the driving behavior, route risk, and route choice of older drivers", IEEE Trans. Hum. Mach. Syst., vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 10-19, 2019.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/THMS.2018.2874180]
[2]
Mathworks, "Fuzzy Logic Toolbox – MATLAB", (2019) [Online]. Available https://in.mathworks.com/products/fuzzy-logic/features.html
[3]
World health organization, "Road Traffic Injuries", (2018) [Online]. Available https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/road-traffic-injuries
[4]
Y. Bian, "Good drivers pay less: A study of usage-based vehicle insurance models", Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract., vol. 107, pp. 20-34, 2018.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2017.10.018]
[5]
F. Knoefel, "Naturalistic driving: A framework and advances in using big data", Geriatrics, vol. 3, no. 2, p. 16, 2018.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/geriatrics3020016]
[6]
J. Pekkanen, "A computational model for driver’s cognitive state, visual perception and intermittent attention in a distracted car following task", Royal Society Open Sci., vol. 5, no. 9, p. 180194, 2018.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.180194]
[7]
J-L. Yin, "Automatic dangerous driving intensity analysis for advanced driver assistance systems from multimodal driving signals", IEEE Sens. J., vol. 18, no. 12, pp. 4785-4794, 2018.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2017.2765315]
[8]
J.F. Júnior, "Driver behavior profiling: An investigation with different smart-phone sensors and machine learning", PLoS One, vol. 12, no. 4, p. e0174959, 2017.
[9]
J. Yu, "Fine-grained abnormal driving behaviors detection and identification with smart-phones", IEEE Trans. Mobile Comput., vol. 16, no. 8, pp. 2198-2212, 2017.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TMC.2016.2618873]
[10]
J. Hu, "Abnormal driving detection based on normalized driving behavior", IEEE Trans. Vehicular Technol., vol. 66, no. 8, pp. 6645-6652, 2017.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2017.2660497]
[11]
M. Blej, International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, vol. 11, no. 22, pp. 11071-11075, 2016.
[12]
G. Castignani, "Driver behavior profiling using smart-phones: A low-cost platform for driver monitoring", IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 91-102, 2015.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MITS.2014.2328673]
[13]
S. Tak, S. Kim, and H. Yeo, "Development of a deceleration-based surrogate safety measure for rear-end collision risk", IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 2435-2445, 2015.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2015.2409374]
[14]
B. Wallace, Measuring variation in driving habits between drivers2014 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications (MeMeA), IEEE, 2014.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MeMeA.2014.6860025]
[15]
I. Karl, "Driving behavior and simulator sickness while driving the vehicle in the loop: Validation of longitudinal driving behavior", IEEE intelligent transportation systems magazine, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 42-57, 2013.
[16]
B-F. Wu, and Y-H. Chen, "Driving behavior-based event data recorder", IET Intell. Transp. Syst., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 361-367, 2013.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1049/iet-its.2013.0009]
[17]
T.A. Ranney, "Driver Distraction 2008 A Review of the Current State-of-Knowledge (DOT HS). Washington, DC, USA", U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. [Online]..https://books.google.com.tw/books?id=wNxWnQAACAAJ
[18]
"HERE Cloud based environments for location-centric data exchange 2020 HERE, Available", https://developer.here.com/products/maps

Rights & Permissions Print Cite
© 2024 Bentham Science Publishers | Privacy Policy